As the government’s efficiency department moves rapidly to remodel the federal government, several groups that challenge Duges in the Court are trying to determine how Elon Musk’s budget cutters could quickly entrust themselves into at least 15 agencies.
During the next week, federal judges ordered the key officials of the Trump administration to testify about the massive shots and the dismantling of the key agencies, while Doge representatives will probably have to deliver evidence in dozens of cases and participate in a sworn deposition for at least one case.
The legal challenges that materialize against Dogs could present an existential challenge for the group, whose effectiveness has emerged in part of its ability to move quickly and make massive changes without normal supervision.
While Musk and Trump have promoted Doge’s transparency, even on the Dege website, where he recently lists contracts, the plaintiffs who challenge the group have argued that the group has been based on the secret to hide tactics that violate the federal law.
“[T]The entity has worked in the shadows, a picture of actors largely unidentified, whose status as government employees is not clear, controlling the main functions of the government without supervision, “said a demand.
This secret has also made it difficult for non -profit organizations or federal unions to block Dux in court, with many plaintiffs that depend on media reports, instead of documentary evidence, to prove that the damages that Dogs has allegedly caused.
“The court cannot act based on media reports. We cannot do that,” said a federal judge in a case about the constitutionality of Musk’s power. “The things I hear are worrisome and worrying, but I have to have a record, and I have to find the facts before issuing something.”
The main advisor of the president’s White and the CEO of Tesla and Spacex, Elon Musk, leaves the United States Capitol, on March 5, 2025, in Washington.
Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
But that could begin to change as cases against Doge progress and the plaintiffs have the right to receive the discovery, that is, the exchange of evidence, relevant to key accusations. At least a federal judge has ordered a DEGE representative who feels for an affidavit about the group’s access to the confidential data of the federal government.
A federal judge in Washington, DC, was scheduled on Friday afternoon to consider what type of regulations will rule the transparency behind Dege after the group argued that it should not be subject to the Law on Freedom of Information, and next week it could provide some of the first jurized testimonies about Trump’s effort to quickly reduce the size of the government from the office.
On Monday, a federal judge in Washington is holding an hearing in which the director of Interim Operations of the Consumer Finance Protection Office has been ordered to testify about the continuous dismantling of the agency, and a separate judge in California on Thursday requires that the interim director of the Office of Personnel Management testify under the OATH on how the Trump administration ordered the mass fire of the employees of the employees.
“We will demonstrate it in this case that markedly, and I do not say this lightly, his honor and interim director [Charles] Ezell is not telling the truth to this court, “a lawyer who defies the massive shots alleged, which leads to the judge who supervises the case to order Ezell to testify in person.
“We are going to make Ezell come out here and he will be under oath and these lawyers will interrogate him,” said the United States District Judge, William Alsup.
During a judicial hearing on Thursday on Ezell’s testimony, the lawyers of the Department of Justice said the administration is considering making Ezell available for the testimony despite the order of the court, citing logistical concerns and their possible appeal of the decision. The lawyers of the plaintiffs described the measure as a clear challenge of a court order and a delay tactic.
“A final decision had not been made,” said a lawyer from the Department of Justice to Judge Alsup, suggesting that the final decision would be made in Washington.
The Trump administration has already begun its appeal in more than a dozen cases that challenge Trump’s executive actions, and two adverse failures have already reached the Supreme Court.
